Cooperating and protecting yourself are not opposites — but they are not the same thing either.
Ask for the worker's name, badge or ID, agency, and the specific allegation. Note the date, time, and who was present. A calm, documented interaction is your best record — and hostility gets written into the report.
The two tracks run in parallel, and statements made to a social worker can end up with the District Attorney. If there is any chance of criminal exposure, get counsel before the interview — not after.
Safety plans, informal supervision, and sending a child to stay with a relative all sound like ways to avoid court. They can also become the evidentiary basis for a petition. Read before you sign, and have someone read it with you.
A dependency case is not one event. It is a sequence of statutory hearings, each with its own burden of proof and its own set of decisions that are hard to undo later.
Also where initial visitation is set, parentage is raised, and the court's inquiry into Indian ancestry begins. First chance to name a relative for placement.
Preponderance of the evidence — a lower bar than criminal court, with looser hearsay rules. The social worker's report comes in; the fight is over what it actually establishes.
Services at home, or removal on clear and convincing evidence with a reunification plan. The case plan written here is the standard you'll be measured against all year.
If the child stayed home, § 364 review — jurisdiction must end unless the original conditions persist. If the child was removed, the 6-, 12-, and 18-month reviews under §§ 366.21–366.22. Two findings carry the case: whether the agency provided reasonable services, and whether return would create a substantial risk of detriment. A reasonable-services finding you don't contest is one you can't appeal.
Twelve months generally, extendable to eighteen — as few as six for a child under three at removal. These clocks run whether or not anyone explained them to you.
Adoption, guardianship, or another permanent plan. Statutory exceptions exist — beneficial parental relationship, sibling bond, a child who objects — but they must be proved with evidence, not sentiment.
Review continues at least every six months until the plan is achieved or jurisdiction ends — including for children in guardianship or long-term placement.
§ 387 is how the county asks for a more restrictive placement. § 388 is how a parent asks the court to change an order on changed circumstances — the door that stays open after the others have closed.
This sequence follows the Judicial Council's Dependency Quick Guide (4th ed. 2025), the reference manual used by attorneys appointed in these cases.
These rarely appear in the petition, and they are frequently where a case is actually won or lost.
Indigent parents are entitled to a lawyer at every stage. Ask for one at the first hearing rather than trying to explain yourself alone.
Dependency review windows are short, and a finding accepted without objection generally can't be challenged later. What you don't contest at the hearing usually becomes permanent. There is also a criminal side to many of these allegations — see that guide.
Grandparents and other relatives can request placement and, later, guardianship. Speaking up early matters more than being right later.
The dependency framework, from the petition through permanency.
Authorities current as of 2025. Law changes; nothing here is a substitute for advice on your own facts.
In juvenile law, the widest set of options exists at the very beginning — at intake, before an interview, before anything is signed. Bring us the situation as it stands and we'll map what happens next.